Sunday, May 08, 2011

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Thursday, January 06, 2011

JAZ's favorite mixes of the decade (2000-2010)

My faves (take your pick, these are all rad beyond belief!) -->

Mark 7: Slow Blow (my favorite mix of all time!)

Ryan Chimney/Beat Broker's "Cosmix" series (and "the slow beat mix")

Balearic Mike's "Cosmic Alphonsus" series & the two he did at Emergency in '06

DJ Zecky's "Bar Jam 19.05.04" pts. 1 & 2 

Relaxer's "Relaxer Goes Leather (Eagle 2006)"

Jeno's "Castle of the Imagination" pt. 1

Soft Rocks: Lower East Side Boogie

Hey Convict's BIS show (the one with Boomerang's 'Na Zapadou" track in it).

Albion: Mixtura series 

Charles Bals: Beach Freaks Don't Like Secrets

Hysteric's: Sun After Rain

Baris K's "Eurasia Mix" series

(obviously) Harvey's: Sarcastic Disco

Loud-E: Lazertown 2007 (and the IFMX transmission) 

Frank (of Voodoo Funk blog) "Lagos Disco Inferno" & "Show Me Your Backside"

Marni's "Lonely Galaxy"

Casco: the one he did live in London a few years ago with all the Italo classics

Javels/Cedric "Les Yeux dans les Yeux" 

Matthew Burgess: "The Love in your Eye"

Jan Hammered's "Airport Airport"

Tolouse Low Tracks: "Savant Dance"

Vidal Benjamin's "Balearic Nightmare"

Lexx: Love Without Sound

Alex Le-Tan's: When the Snow Falls

Nitedog & Lovefingers: Poolside Pleasures (live at the Ace Hotel)

Bumrocks & Hey Convict: Purple Brain

Fleming Dalum's "Boogie Down Rimini"

Sorcerer's "El Increíble Viaje de la Hechicero"

Baldelli's "Cosmic Disc?! Cosmic Rock!!"

...and "A Mix by JAZ" (both discs) ;)

Monday, August 09, 2010

I'm selling some records:

My Discogs Store (Click Me!)

Happy belated 4th of July!

This is my favorite Jimi Hendrix moment:

Sunday, July 04, 2010

William Kilpatrick quote:

“It is very nearly the First Commandment of the psychological society that we should accept ourselves as we are. We are urged to greater self-awareness on the happy assumption that we will like what we find. We are, as the saying goes, OK. We just have to learn to be ourselves…In contrast, Christianity starts off by saying that we’re not OK the way we are. There is something wrong with us – a twist in our natures. And the twist is not removed by liking yourself” (The Emperor's New Clothes, pp. 20-21).

Friday, July 02, 2010

Flaming Pianos

Walter Bense

From the intro to Holl's "Reconstruction of Morality":

"All traditional ethics -- whether focusing on virtues, culture, values, or duties -- are to be 'purified' by the (right) Christian ethic, which retains their good points even as it goes beyond them”.

Monday, June 21, 2010

ORS - Who Built the Pyramids?

Great lighting at the beginning!

The much better instrumental version is: this.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Interview with Daniele Baldelli

At least watch the first half. He was inspired (un-selfconsciously). When he plays Harry Thumann at 33, instead of 45, you begin to sense the magic of this man's amazing ears.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Stirring.


(thanks JDK)

Monday, March 15, 2010

Monday, December 07, 2009

Valerie Dore: The Night (1984)


Don't miss the (best French Revolution) drummer (of all time) starting at 0:33!!!

Excerpt from Pascal's "Provincial Letters: #2"


Shall I describe for you the situation of the church in the midst of these different views? I think of it like a man who, leaving his native country to travel abroad, encounters robbers who would him so severely that they leave him half dead. He sends for three doctors who are resident in the neighborhood. The first, after probing his wounds, pronounces them to be mortal and tells him that only God can restore him. The second, wishing to flatter him, assures him that he has sufficient strength to reach home and insults the first for opposing his opinion and threatens to ruin him. When the unfortunate patient sees the third physician approach, he stretches out his hands to welcome him as the one who will decide the dispute.

This physician, upon looking at his wounds and learning of the opinions already given, agrees with the second and together they turn upon the first with contempt. They now form the strongest party. The patient infers from this that the third physician agrees with the second, and on asking him the question, assures him most positively that he has enough strength for the proposed journey. But the wounded man, expatiating upon his weakness, asks how he came to this conclusion.

"Why, you still have legs, and legs are the means which according to the nature of things, are sufficient for the purpose of walking."

The wounded traveler replies, "That may be, but have I all the strength required for using them? They really seem useless to me in my present weakened condition."

"Certainly they are," replies the physician, "and you will never be able to walk unless God gives you some extraordinary assistance to sustain and guide you."

"What then," says the sick man, "have I not sufficient strength in myself to be able to walk?"

"Oh no, far from it."

"Then you have a different opinion from your friend respecting my real condition."

"I must admit, I have."

What do you suppose the wounded man would say to all this? He would certainly complain of the strange procedure and of the ambiguous language of the third physician. He scolds him for agreeing with the second, when in fact he is of a contrary opinion, although they appear to agree and drive away the first in doing so. When he tries his strength and finds that he is only weak, he gets rid of them both. He then recalls the first one, who puts him under his care, follows his advice, and asks God for strength which he knows he needs. His petitions are heard, and eventually he reaches home in peace.

Sunday, November 15, 2009